of habit and inertia we talk about "right" even in Italy, although such a political force in the European sense of the word, we just do not exist. "Right" meant, by the end of the war to date, Churchill and De Gaulle, Thatcher and Chirac, and Germany, a tradition that goes from Adenauer to Kohl, and then Angela Merkel (the "center" does not exist). Is there any track of the values \u200b\u200band behavior of these personalities can be identified in Silvio Berlusconi and his nearly two decades of political activity? Even with a scanning electron microscope.
"Right" in Europe has meant and means liberal-conservative parties that insist on the almost obsessive sense of the state and institutions, the unity of the nation (always capitalized), the reaffirmation uncompromising and even punitive the law (what is more executioner of the policy is flaunting "law and order"?). On the economic positions are more varied, from free "hard and pure "Mrs Thatcher to full-bodied implants solidarism the CDU, to the real social and coté is often state-of Gaullism, but common hostility to the principle of private monopolies (abc obvious and intractable of all liberalism).
it becomes obvious that Berlusconi and Berlusconi have nothing to do with the right in the European sense of the word. The draft Berlusconi - from the outset - that of a system that removes the separation of powers, independence of the judiciary that humble obedience to political power, which establishes a dependency between plebiscite "the people" and leader, which reduces to a mere simulacrum of freedom of information, so that the Chapter and its cliques "to do" without more checks and balances of any kind. For this, for years, we argue that the substance of Berlusconi and Putin. For anyone who had "ears to hear" it was impossible not to notice, since the fateful day of "down the pitch."
Who chatter about a bet / promise of "liberal revolution" by Berlusconi, who later failed or forgotten / trade (sum of the genre specialists Galli della Loggia and the Ostellino), simply did not want to see what Berlusconi with his behavior, and with infinite "Voices from sen fled", spread from the very beginning of his adventure: a vocation to the irrepressible master scheme of institutions, public affairs and politics. Berlusconi on the "liberal" was not wrong, they were so brazen and exhibited its anti-Constitutional intentions. Assuming good faith in those who wanted to peddle a ridiculous legend for years, it would fall into the most virulent blame coryphaei cheerleader and incurable blindness, a mammoth stupidity.
The Gianfranco Fini, who now definitively breaks with Berlusconi is precisely the project of creating in Italy a European-style conservative right. His decision has matured over many years. Too many, of course. But Fini and the handful of leaders who followed him were from fascism, let us not forget, and a genuine conversion from "eia eia alal" to liberal democracy is not the case with the rapidity of a fall from a horse on the road to Damascus. Moreover, therein lies the explanation of the (many) years in which Fini did guardiaspalla shoulder prosthesis and the construction of the Putin regime Berlusconi. Fini, Berlusconi has a very rapid "clearance" (the Communist Party to get it partially, and although it was fully co-founder of the Italian Republic, had to suffer for some forty years after the de-Stalinization), its legitimacy was so (too) long sequestered (voluntary) safe in Arcore.
Fini can now do it? The right of coinage Europe has in mind can be successful? With Berlusconi every conflict is a zero-sum, this repeat it unnecessarily for years. The compromises are not possible, or he is sent home (in fact the right place would be the jail) or being crushed. The condition "sine qua non" for a European right is so full dismantling of Berlusconi, Italy's liberation of debris that is moral, cultural, social and institutional, in which Berlusconi and his cliques have reduced it. Berlusconi, against Fini, its not just a giant fire power corrupt, but also almost the entire past history of Italy. The lack of an autonomous civil society: a business "parasitic", a middle class that "brings the intrigue about and manifests a" primitive psychology, from pirates and slavers speculators "that produces" an era of corruption and decadence in morals, "as the liberal stigmatized Piero Gobetti, which is no coincidence that the" liberal revolution "(the real one) relied on the alliance with the workers' councils supported by Gramsci.
all the more difficult to build today, a right liberal in Italy, where the traditional European Right immunized by the sirens seem less and less-authoritarian populist and compromises with commercialism Kombinat of speculative finance junkie (and polluted by recycling) of soft racism (and sometimes hard), hostility to free journalism and "non olet" to the mafia. Since its collapse, however, Fini Berlusconi in which the country is plummeting, the levels of third-rate corrupt world of disinformation, the mass of inculturation, which have already triggered the economic decline. Too bad that in this clash is still missing the left. Paolo Flores d'Arcais
0 comments:
Post a Comment